| UUDDLRLRBA Multiplatform Gaming http://uuddlrlrba.co.uk/forum/ |
|
| VISTA vs XP! http://uuddlrlrba.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=1073 |
Page 3 of 3 |
| Author: | GuitarrassDeAmor [ Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: VISTA vs XP! |
fiannoglach wrote: Vista is good if you have a really good spec pc, and don't mind losing some performance. And if you're installing a printer!! You do NOT lose performance. You gain it if anything. http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2 ... 499,00.asp |
|
| Author: | Se[BBB]e [ Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: VISTA vs XP! |
Who cares about gaming performs, I want desktop performance to be snappy. Lightweight systems ftfw. |
|
| Author: | GuitarrassDeAmor [ Sat Jan 24, 2009 10:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: VISTA vs XP! |
Se[BBB]e wrote: Who cares about gaming performs, I want desktop performance to be snappy. Lightweight systems ftfw. Then use Fluxbox. My desktop performance is "snappy". I'm browsing the net while playing music/transferring it to my phone while the FEAR 2 demo is minimized (1920x1200, everything max, 4x AF 2x AA), STEAM is running, and Utorrent is up. Plus my wireless and AVG. |
|
| Author: | Se[BBB]e [ Sat Jan 24, 2009 11:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: VISTA vs XP! |
GuitarrassDeAmor wrote: Se[BBB]e wrote: Who cares about gaming performs, I want desktop performance to be snappy. Lightweight systems ftfw. Then use Fluxbox. I do? |
|
| Author: | GuitarrassDeAmor [ Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: VISTA vs XP! |
Se[BBB]e wrote: GuitarrassDeAmor wrote: Se[BBB]e wrote: Who cares about gaming performs, I want desktop performance to be snappy. Lightweight systems ftfw. Then use Fluxbox. I do? Do you? |
|
| Author: | Se[BBB]e [ Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: VISTA vs XP! |
|
|
|
| Page 3 of 3 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|