UUDDLRLRBA Multiplatform Gaming
http://uuddlrlrba.co.uk/forum/

You would bang, you lose (NSFW)
http://uuddlrlrba.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=8054
Page 3 of 5

Author:  Ax [ Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

Image

Image

Image

Author:  dragonheat [ Wed Aug 28, 2013 10:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

rost at ax

Author:  Prof. Chaos [ Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

Hnnnggg

Author:  SugaFree [ Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

Red hair is my kryptonite

Author:  Erbsdaword [ Thu Aug 29, 2013 12:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

Ax wrote:
Image


lost....all over my desk.

Author:  Bokuten [ Thu Aug 29, 2013 5:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

Image

Author:  Prof. Chaos [ Thu Aug 29, 2013 12:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

All over her.

Author:  fanboy19 [ Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

she looks like she's 16. no lose

Author:  Prof. Chaos [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

fanboy19 wrote:
she looks like she's 16. no lose


Are you implying that's a negative aspect?

Author:  fanboy19 [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

if you're 18 or over it is.

Author:  Joe [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

Prof. Chaos wrote:
fanboy19 wrote:
she looks like she's 16. no lose


Are you implying that's a negative aspect?

Dude... What?

Author:  Prof. Chaos [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

fanboy19 wrote:
if you're 18 or over it is.


Joe wrote:
Dude... What?


In the US, age of consent varies between 16-18 depending on the state.

Author:  Blokeymon [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 1:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

Also, looks like =/= actually is.

Author:  Terradude [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 2:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

Blokeymon wrote:
Also, looks like =/= actually is.


Yeah, but when you go "mmm, she looks underage, perfect" it's really creepy, as it implies that what you want out of a sexual partner is someone who's underage.
Not that 16 is, probably, in Ross's area, but it's still p weird. :?

Author:  Blokeymon [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW)

I didn't see Prof's post as going "mmmmm underage", I saw it as "she looks younger than she actually is, big whoop, wanna fight about it", as if trying to say that just because someone looks younger than they are doesn't make them any less attractive than they are.

Kinda thing.

Also, Lucy Lawless as Lucretia in Spartacus.

Image

Page 3 of 5 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/