UUDDLRLRBA Multiplatform Gaming http://uuddlrlrba.co.uk/forum/ |
|
You would bang, you lose (NSFW) http://uuddlrlrba.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=8054 |
Page 3 of 5 |
Author: | Ax [ Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
Author: | dragonheat [ Wed Aug 28, 2013 10:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
rost at ax |
Author: | Prof. Chaos [ Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
Hnnnggg |
Author: | SugaFree [ Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
Red hair is my kryptonite |
Author: | Erbsdaword [ Thu Aug 29, 2013 12:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
Ax wrote: lost....all over my desk. |
Author: | Bokuten [ Thu Aug 29, 2013 5:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
Author: | Prof. Chaos [ Thu Aug 29, 2013 12:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
All over her. |
Author: | fanboy19 [ Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
she looks like she's 16. no lose |
Author: | Prof. Chaos [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
fanboy19 wrote: she looks like she's 16. no lose Are you implying that's a negative aspect? |
Author: | fanboy19 [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
if you're 18 or over it is. |
Author: | Joe [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
Prof. Chaos wrote: fanboy19 wrote: she looks like she's 16. no lose Are you implying that's a negative aspect? Dude... What? |
Author: | Prof. Chaos [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
fanboy19 wrote: if you're 18 or over it is. Joe wrote: Dude... What? In the US, age of consent varies between 16-18 depending on the state. |
Author: | Blokeymon [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 1:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
Also, looks like =/= actually is. |
Author: | Terradude [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 2:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
Blokeymon wrote: Also, looks like =/= actually is. Yeah, but when you go "mmm, she looks underage, perfect" it's really creepy, as it implies that what you want out of a sexual partner is someone who's underage. Not that 16 is, probably, in Ross's area, but it's still p weird. |
Author: | Blokeymon [ Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: You would bang, you lose (NSFW) |
I didn't see Prof's post as going "mmmmm underage", I saw it as "she looks younger than she actually is, big whoop, wanna fight about it", as if trying to say that just because someone looks younger than they are doesn't make them any less attractive than they are. Kinda thing. Also, Lucy Lawless as Lucretia in Spartacus. |
Page 3 of 5 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |